Cultural Context Matters: Avoiding Assumptions in EdTech Design
- LMSPortals
- Mar 28
- 5 min read
EdTech products are often built with good intentions: to make learning more accessible, more effective, and more scalable. But intention doesn’t equal impact—especially when cultural context is ignored. Too many education technologies are designed with a narrow worldview, assuming that what works in one place will work everywhere else. That assumption is not just naïve—it’s harmful.
In a global market, designing without attention to cultural differences leads to tools that fall flat or, worse, reinforce inequalities. Language, pedagogy, access, values—these vary widely across countries and communities. EdTech that doesn't account for that is doomed to fail the very learners it aims to help.
The Western Default Problem
A huge chunk of EdTech originates in the U.S., the U.K., or other English-speaking Western countries. This brings with it a baked-in bias: English as the default language, Western academic standards, linear learning models, and assumptions about technology access and usage.
Take for example a typical learning management system (LMS). It might assume students work independently, submit assignments online, engage through written discussion forums, and learn through self-paced modules. That might work fine in a U.S. college, but in many parts of the world—where communal learning, oral discussion, and teacher-led instruction are the norm—it clashes with how education is practiced and valued.
Even the design of user interfaces carries assumptions. Consider color use. In the West, red may signal error or urgency. In parts of East Asia, red can signify good fortune. Icons, gestures, fonts, layout direction—these all carry cultural meaning. Ignoring them doesn’t just confuse users; it can alienate them.
Language Isn’t Just Translation
Language is one of the most obvious aspects of cultural difference, but it goes far beyond translation. A system that simply converts its English text to Spanish, Hindi, or Swahili is still working from a Western model of how information is organized and taught. True localization means rethinking the structure of content, the examples used, the way questions are asked, and what counts as “correct.”
Think about a math word problem that references baseball statistics or snow days. That’s not just hard to translate—it’s irrelevant in places where baseball isn’t played and snow doesn’t fall. Cultural mismatch in examples can create confusion and disengagement.
Also, tone matters. A chatbot tutor designed to sound friendly and informal might come off as disrespectful or too casual in cultures that expect formality in teacher-student dynamics. Humor, idioms, even emojis—all need cultural filtering.
Pedagogical Assumptions Run Deep
Many EdTech tools are built on pedagogical assumptions that reflect a specific cultural stance on education. The U.S. system, for example, values individualism, student choice, and discovery-based learning. It’s common for U.S.-based EdTech to encourage self-paced progress, gamification, or peer grading. But that doesn’t translate universally.
In East Asian classrooms, where deference to authority and collective success are often emphasized, a tool that expects students to critique each other or challenge ideas might feel inappropriate. In parts of Africa, where educational resources are scarce and class sizes are large, a model that assumes one-to-one device access simply isn’t viable.
Even the idea of “personalized learning” can feel foreign. In cultures where the teacher is the center of authority and knowledge, removing that figure or minimizing their role through automation can be seen as diminishing the value of education itself.
The Problem With “Scalable” Solutions
One of the biggest selling points of EdTech is scalability. But scalable isn’t the same as equitable. A one-size-fits-all platform might work in multiple places—but not equally well, and not without unintended side effects.
A so-called “global” solution that doesn’t adapt to local norms often leads to surface-level engagement. Schools may adopt the platform to tick a box or chase funding, but students don’t use it meaningfully. Or worse, the platform might be used in a way that reinforces existing power dynamics—like when teachers rely on it to monitor students rather than engage them.
Moreover, digital divides aren’t just about internet access. They’re also about tech literacy, attitudes toward screens, and norms around time management. A product that expects students to log in daily, complete tasks asynchronously, and self-motivate assumes a level of digital familiarity and personal agency that may not be realistic.
Cultural Competency in Design
So how do EdTech designers avoid these pitfalls? The answer is cultural competency—not just in theory, but embedded into the design process.
That means doing the work: engaging with local educators, students, and parents during product development, not just after launch. It means hiring local teams or partnering with regional experts who understand the nuances of the market. It also means testing for more than functionality—testing for relevance, tone, usability, and fit with local educational goals.
Co-creation is key. Involving users not as testers but as collaborators shifts the dynamic. It leads to tools that reflect real needs, real contexts, and real learning environments.
Case Studies: When Context Is Considered
Some EdTech ventures are getting it right by centering cultural context from the start.
Eneza Education
Based in Kenya, provides SMS-based learning for students in low-resource areas. The platform isn’t flashy—it’s intentionally low-tech. It was designed with the understanding that many learners don’t have smartphones or reliable internet. Lessons are aligned with local curriculums, and the format mirrors how students are already used to learning.
Byju’s
A major EdTech player in India, tailors its content to Indian curricula and languages. Its success isn’t just about slick videos—it’s about understanding the pressure of high-stakes exams in Indian culture and designing around that stress point.
Kolibri
An open-source platform developed by Learning Equality, enables offline access to educational content. It was designed for use in refugee camps, rural schools, and prisons—contexts where bandwidth is low or nonexistent. Kolibri’s strength is its flexibility: content can be localized, and communities can curate it themselves.
These examples show that context-aware design doesn’t mean limited reach. It often means greater impact.
What Needs to Change
To move toward more inclusive and effective EdTech, several shifts need to happen:
Stop defaulting to English and Western norms
Make localization more than a checkbox—treat it as core to product design.
Design for constraints, not just possibilities
Connectivity, device access, and bandwidth are not the same everywhere. Products that perform well in low-resource settings tend to be more universally usable.
Embed cultural feedback loops
Use continuous input from diverse communities, not just pre-launch surveys or pilot studies.
Hire and empower local voices
Representation in leadership, design, and strategy isn’t just ethical—it leads to better products.
Think plural, not singular
There is no one "right" way to learn. The best tools are modular, flexible, and adaptable across contexts.
Final Thought: Respect Over Assumption
At the heart of this issue is respect. Respect for learners, for teachers, and for the cultures they’re part of. Assumptions about how education “should” work—based on one cultural lens—undermine that respect.
EdTech has incredible potential to close gaps, democratize learning, and empower communities. But only if it listens first. Cultural context isn’t a hurdle to scale. It’s the foundation of meaningful design.
When EdTech products are built with humility, curiosity, and genuine engagement with cultural differences, they stop being just exports—and start becoming part of the fabric of local learning ecosystems.
About LMS Portals
At LMS Portals, we provide our clients and partners with a mobile-responsive, SaaS-based, multi-tenant learning management system that allows you to launch a dedicated training environment (a portal) for each of your unique audiences.
The system includes built-in, SCORM-compliant rapid course development software that provides a drag and drop engine to enable most anyone to build engaging courses quickly and easily.
We also offer a complete library of ready-made courses, covering most every aspect of corporate training and employee development.
If you choose to, you can create Learning Paths to deliver courses in a logical progression and add structure to your training program. The system also supports Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) and provides tools for social learning.
Together, these features make LMS Portals the ideal SaaS-based eLearning platform for our clients and our Reseller partners.
Contact us today to get started or visit our Partner Program pages
Comments